Echos of Vietnam in Kabul
| 
| Hits: 431
Vietnamese fought their Jihad bravely and kicked out all occupiers and invaders from the French to US and recently China
In the midst of the Taliban attacks in central Kabul on Sunday, a journalist called the British embassy for a comment. “I really don’t know why they are doing this,” said the exasperated diplomat who answered the phone. “We’ll be out of here in two years’ time. All they have to do is wait.” The official line is that by two years from now, when U.S. and NATO forces leave Afghanistan, the regime they installed will be able to stay in power without foreign support. The British diplomat clearly didn’t believe that, and neither do most other foreign observers.
Gen. John Allen, commander of the International Security Assistance Force, however, predictably said that he was “enormously proud” of the response of the Afghan security forces, and various other senior commanders said that it showed that all the foreign training was paying off. You have to admire their cheek: multiple simultaneous attacks in Kabul and three other Afghan cities prove that the Western strategy is working.
Mass killings of civilians has not brought victory in the US terror war on Afghanistan
The Taliban’s attacks in the Afghan capital on Sunday targeted the national parliament, NATO’s headquarters, and the German, British, Japanese and Russian embassies. About 100 people were killed or wounded, and the fighting lasted for 18 hours. There was a similar attack in the centre of the Afghan capital last September. If this were the Vietnam war, we would now have reached about 1971.
The U.S. government has already declared its intention to withdraw from Afghanistan in two years’ time, just as it did in Vietnam back in 1971. Richard Nixon wanted his second-term presidential election out of the way before he pulled the plug, just as Barack Obama does now. The Taliban are obviously winning the war in Afghanistan now, just as North Vietnam’s troops were winning in South Vietnam then. The American strategy at that time was satirized as “declare a victory and leave,” and it hasn’t changed one whit in 40 years. Neither have the lies that cover it up.
Many in US are tired of blowing billions in Afghanistan
The U.S. puppet government in South Vietnam only survived for two years after U.S. forces left in 1973. The puppet government in Kabul may not even last that long after the last American troops leave Afghanistan in 2014. But no Western general will admit that the war is lost, even though their denial means that more of their soldiers must die pointlessly.
“It’s like I see in slow motion men dying for nothing and I can’t stop it,” said Lt.-Col. Daniel Davis, a U.S. Army officer who spent two tours in Afghanistan. He returned home last year consumed by outrage at the yawning gulf between the promises of success routinely issued by American senior commanders and the real situation on the ground.
To be fair, none of those generals was asked whether invading Afghanistan was a good idea. That was decided 10 years ago, when most of them were just colonels. But if they read the intelligence reports, they know that they cannot win this war. If they go on making upbeat predictions anyway, they are responsible for the lives that are wasted.
“It is consuming me from inside,” explained Lt.-Col. Davis, and he wrote two reports on the situation in Afghanistan, one classified and one for public consumption. The unclassified one began: “Senior ranking U.S. military leaders have so distorted the truth when communicating with the U.S. Congress and the American people as regards to conditions on the ground in Afghanistan that the truth has become unrecognizable.”
The end of US occupation of Vietnam came quickly
Davis gave his first interview to the New York Times in early February, and sent copies of the classified version to selected senators and representatives in Congress. But no member of Congress is going to touch the issue in an election year, for fear of being labelled “unpatriotic.” So American, British and other Western soldiers will continue to die, as will thousands of Afghans, in order to postpone the inevitable outcome for a few more years.
It’s not necessarily even an outcome that threatens American security, for there was always a big difference between the Taliban and their ungrateful guests, al-Qaida. The Taliban were and are big local players in the Afghan political game, but they never showed any interest in attacking the United States. Al-Qaida were pan-Islamist revolutionaries, mostly Arabs and Pakistanis, who abused their hosts’ hospitality by doing exactly that.
It was never necessary to invade Afghanistan at all. Senior Taliban commanders were furious that al-Qaida’s 9/11 attacks had exposed them to the threat of invasion, and came close to evicting Osama bin Laden at the Kandahar jirga (tribal parliament) in October 2001. Wait a little longer, spread a few million dollars around in bribes, and the United States could probably have had a victory over al-Qaida without a war in Afghanistan.
War pigs classic music video on the Vietnam war
It’s much too late for that now, but al-Qaida survives more as an ideology than as an organization, and most Afghans (including the Taliban) remain profoundly uninterested in affairs beyond their own borders. Whatever political system emerges in Afghanistan after the foreigners go home, it is unlikely to want to attack the United States. Pity about all the people who will be killed between now and then.
Gwynne Dyer is a London-based independent journalist whose articles are published in 45 countries.
Related Articles
Hillary Clinton and the Pentagon Generales are braying lies same as in Vietnam. Col Daniel says the emperor got no clothes.
Afghans who have gone and killed NATO occupiers have been invariably shot and killed (never apprehended and given trials). But that rule may not apply when an occupation soldier does it. In Iraq the occupation troops killed entire families but got only 30 days and a dishonorable discharge for their troubles.
India says Uncle Sam we love you won't you please stay a bit longer? (and burn more moneys fighting our enemies). India wants US to stay in Afghanistan even if it costs the US hundreds of billion dollars per year. India is also bypassing US embargo on Iran. US friends are worse than US enemies. They cost more and just want to exploit US. In fact US enemies like North Korea and Iran cost less than US friends like Israel or Egypt.
US soldiers have repeatedly raped then killed and burned the bodies to hide the evidence. This was the way they operated in occupied Iraq and now in Afghanistan. Us whisks away soldiers so no can interview them. Even Karzai admits many soldiers involved.
Russians want to US to keep plowing in hundreds of billions along with countless wounded and killed in Afghanistan. This is their way of paying back US for what US did to Soviets in Afghanistan. US public taxpayers are tired of blowing more and more tax monies into Afghanistan. Soviet FM er Russian FM says leaving in 2014 is too early..
But says details of bribe cannot be discussed with reporters.
According to Pentagon one soldier walked from base killed a bunch of villagers walked back to base walked out again went to a different village killed some more women and babies then staked the bodies and burnt them with the chemicals he had brought with him. When the poor relatives start talking to the media US army passing out 50K bribes to relatives of the dead in order to keep them quiet. US media rarely reporting on presense of multiple killers.